Who would think that the so-called No. 1 Philippine
Newspaper in the land or in the Philippines could be the No.1 idiot and Bias
newspaper in terms of accurate journalism in the land or idiot Newspaper in the
Philippines? Or are they just faking their statistics that they are number one
newspaper just like or similar to deliberate public deception of the so-called
No.1 TV station in the Philippines – the GMA Channel 7 –wherein they already
admitted their bankruptcy and low ratings or their clear deliberate deception
to their viewers and to their loyal viewers.
“…For if they rule the Philippine Television how come they
themselves admit that they lost revenues mostly last year and the TV network is
for auction and PLDT/Smart/Sun/TV5 chair and CEO Manuel V. Pangilinan is buying
the TV network for P60 billion pesos?...”
“…Our net income took a beating..We experienced the lowest
net income level, of the past 5 years in the 4th quarter of
2011..”,admitted and verified by GMA Channel 7 vice president for finance,
Ronaldo P. Mastrili.
| INQ7 |
Added to that, the GMA 7 “Kapuso” chair and CEO Felipe L.
Gozon is sure to sell the TV network to PLDT/Smart/Sun/TV5’s chair and CEO
Manuel V. Pangilinan for P60 billion pesos but Pangilinan wants to buy the TV
network between P45 billion pesos and P51 billion pesos….“"Kung may mag-o-offer ng P500 billion, kahit
tulog ako, gisingin n'yo ako, I will sell."
Therefore, the rumor is true that it could be the end of GMA
7 or let us see what will happen next though the TV network executives are
denying it on media….”
Oh my gracious! This can’t be!
How come the number one TV station Daw is in partnership
with the number one Newspaper in the Philippines Daw; Very Nice Partnership:
the one deliberately lying on the TV ratings and the other one deliberately
lying on their journal reports.WOW What a perfect Partnership which they call
“INQ7.NET” or “INQ7 Interactive Inc” ; Is this a code to crack their LIES?
Let’s see INQ stands for what? Yes, you are right thephilippines.ph readers,
INQ stands for “INQUIRER”; while the number 7(seven) stands for GMA Channel 7.
That is to say INQ7 is inquiring for SHIT (Siete : 7) news
and write ups that are so obviously bias camouflaging to be True DAW.
"INQ7.net will now serve as a portal for the
Inquirer.net and the gmanews.tv websites,"
“..INQ7 Interactive Inc. is a joint venture between two giants in
Philippine media -- the Philippine Daily Inquirer Inc., the country's most
widely circulated broadsheet, and GMA Network Inc., the most awarded broadcast
company. Combining original content with material from the
Inquirer, GMA and other partners, INQ7.net provides the most comprehensive
coverage throughout the site's different sections, including Nation, Breaking
News, Editorial & Opinion, Business, Lifestyle, Entertainment, Metro,
Regions, World News, Sports and Infotech…”
Ani ni Mike Enriquez : “Walang Kinikiling, Walang
Pinoprotektuhan, Walang Kasinungaling..(No Biases, No Cover-Up, No Lies)..”Oh
WHAT?! “EXCUSE ME PO!! Ahemm”. What about the Lying lips of GMA Channel 7 about
the selling of their TV Station and admission of very low revenues contrary to
what they boast about highest TV Ratings Daw in the Land? “EXCUSE ME PO!!!..”
Ahem ahem..what about that I thought this so-called Number One Daw TV station
in the Philippines on their daily evening primetime news program “24 Oras” or
“24 Hours” which is somewhat clone to its competitor on other channel “TV
Patrol” quite synonymous is not it? How do you patrol or rather Patrolling News
is around the clock is not it? So patrolling around the clock is..tarannn!!! :
you got “24 Oras(Hours)”!; ““Walang Kinikiling, Walang Pinoprotektuhan, Walang
Kasinungaling..(No Biases, No Cover-Up, No Lies) But they are Lying on their TV
ratings! Are they not Bias then; Covering Up something and Making Lies? Oh my
gracious!
Meanwhile, what about this INQ INQ, oh wait MOOOWW rather,
because their cartoon symbol is a carabao; INQ INQ is hogs or swine; oh wait
OINK OINK rather.”EXCUSE ME PO!!..ahem ahem!”
On their previous issue dated Wednesday, May 30, 2012;Volume
27 No.171; Wooohlalala..You will found
yourself “GUILTY!” on boldface; You will be astound to what they done to
the size of the word “GUILTY!” since all certified lawyers in the Philippines
as well as the smart intelligent Philippines senators except for those who
can’t speak English, Vendetta-fied soldier, ancient senators, sporty senators,
and so forth whatever runs the ball of Senate Ball; will agree that Chief
Justice Renato Corona is NOT GUILTY! (Ehehe) to the allegations thrown against
him. The pronouncement of “GUILTY!” verdict is not of related to the REAL CASE;
it is IMMATERIAL and IRRELEVANT, “Your Honor”..Hey Senator Enrile do you kiss
the Ass of the Oldie and rumored Gayish Noynoy when you already knew that the
persecution team is on the brink of “ZERO ACCOMPLISHMENT” in pertinent to the
real case just like their Master Noynoy.? How come when you grow old you decide
to divorce your “beloved”[???] wife? hmmm…
Hey INQ INQ or PDI
(Putang Dyaryong Ito!) or should I say, the Philippine Daily Inquirer, is
not it the “GUILTY!” verdict is IMMATERIAL and IRRELEVANT to the Case, so why
you published on BOLDFACE and on BIG FONT so BIG that eats up the entire ads
space which cost somewhat you know BIG BUCKS; are you IDIOT? I guess so.
As I said on my previous article : “For it obviously evident
that the persecution team failed to convict Chief Justice Renato Corona for the
allegations accused against Him; Senator Juan Ponce Enrile knew that but has become
fool of his own emotion.
“..The prosecution panel, however, cannot lay claim to have
convincingly won its case as it was Corona’s testimony that led most of the
senator-judges to rule in favor of conviction and not the pieces of evidence
presented by the prosecution panel that is led by allies of President Aquino in
the House of Representatives…”
Furthermore, even any one is afraid to disclose one’s
properties to public; the Justice System in the Philippines is all about
Tyranny and Hypocrisy and there is not Truth in it, for even the most hypocrite
current President Noynoy would resist to disclose one’s properties when on
public Trial….”
“…Yes, the impeachment trial has been diverted into
disclosing one’s own precious properties rather than on how and why Chief
Justice Renato Corona’s appointment is legal or not; the persecution team or
the Noynoy has not proven him guilty of the accusations but just solely based
their hypocritical and erroneous judgment on not sharing one’s own properties…”
So Now “Putang
Dyaryong Ito” Or PDI, being the number one Philippine newspaper in the
Philippines as you said or rather claim, how can you be so number one if some
Filipinos especially those smart ones loathe your newspaper to be so bias, so
whom you sell to? Are all major Filipinos, IDIOT? OwWowaw! Filipinos are “GUILTY!” of being “FOOL!” if Philippine
Daily Inquirer’s statistics is not right and true. Who is the fool? still the Filipinos “worth
dying for..” and the “Filipino Of the Year” is : “NOYNOY AQUINO! For 2010”
Ngek, what does Noynoy done to be a “Filipino of the Year”? Oh my gracious!
You want more?
And again for 2004 “Filipino of the Year” is : “FERNANDO POE
JR.!”, Oh what? Oh my gracious! No offense for late Philippine actor as well as
to his fans; Honestly, what makes him “Filipino of the Year”? Being an actor?
There are many veterans actors out there who also done extra extra services to
the Filipinos aside from entertaining them on stage;ika nga “EXTRA SERVICE PO!”
I have no more nothing to say about these two so-called
“Giant Media” in the Philippines on their so-called being “No.1”; GOODLUCK! Let
their Lies bless them if I don’t know to You Filipino Nation; you decide!
The Misrepresented Hero
| AB |
Last November 30, the Philippines celebrate again what they
call “Bonifacio day” commemorating the heroism of Andres Bonifacio and labeling
him the “Hero of the Filipino Mass”. But some adept historians persistently ask
“Where are the Filipino masses?”, signifying that the title “Hero of the
Filipino Mass” is amiss depiction of the real Andres Bonifacio. Moreover, the
dress get up depiction of Andres Bonifacio which most Filipinos were accustomed
to depict Andres Bonifacio wearing a white camisa de chino with red neckerchief
and red drawstring pants, as well as holding a bolo knife in an angry mood
shouting “Sugod mga kapatid!”(Charge!) just like the statue we saw formerly at
Balintawak and now relocated at UP Diliman ground, is absolutely wrong and that
the real Andres Bonifacio depicted on historical photos and documents like the
one in the July 14, 1911 issue of “Renacimiento Filipino”, wherein the Andres
Bonifacio there is wearing a coat and tie, just like the other Filipino heroes
like Jose Rizal, Antonio Luna, Juan Luna, and others.
Andres Bonifacio is not seem to be the illiterate poor guy
as the mainstream Philippine history try to convince and indoctrinate Filipino
masses. He has some wealth, and if he will fight an enemy he will use a gun
instead, rather than a bolo knife. Therefore, he is not really the “Hero of the
Filipino Mass”.
Actually, the statue which we formerly saw at Balintawak
which erroneously presented by some to the public as Andres Bonifacio himself
have a plaque on it saying “Ala-ala ng Bayang Pilipino sa mga Bayani ng ‘96”(A
memorial of the Filipino People to the Heroes of 1896) and not “Andres
Bonifacio”; which clearly says that the statue is and was not Andres Bonifacio.
Moreover, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas never depicts Andres Bonifacio with
what the Filipinos have accustomed represent Andres rather they depict Andres
in a more dignified one. However the UP Diliman has dubiously re-labeled the
plaque on its relocation on its compound saying the statue is and was Andres
Bonifacio himself which only intensifies confusion among the Filipino masses.
But as we all know the UP Diliman is a Christian school, so expect Christian’s
erroneous way of depicting history.
Actually, the statue which was misrepresented to be Andres
Bonifacio was the work of the Filipino artist Ramon Martinez.
Therefore, the man holding a bolo knife shouting “sugod mga
kapatid!”(Charge!) wearing a white camiso de chino with red neckerchief and red
drawstring pants was just a mere boner or silly blunder to depict Andres
Bonifacio and it is just mere work of fiction by the creative mind of Guillermo
E. Tolentino. Yes, it was Guillermo E. Tolentino who has coined this image,
however, he is now changing what he have coined he now suggesting Andres
Bonifacio to be wearing a barong tagalong instead.
There are actually two type of Andres Bonifacio that
Filipino people knew but the one that marks into the public consciousness among
Filipinos and the one considered to be the real Andres Bonifacio is the one
holding a bolo wearing a white camisa de chino with red neckerchief and red
drawstring pants and shouting “Charge!” than the one who is dignitary in attire
which most of the Spaniards depict Andres Bonifacio then. The one most Filipino
people aware of about Andres Bonifacio is actually wrong historically and
logically and was just a mere imagination of graphic artists which never knew
historical facts. For if the real Andres Bonifacio is the one who wears a white
camisa de chino with red neckerchief and red drawstring pants and shouting
“Charge!” holding a big Knife or bolo knife, why would the Spaniards depict
Andres Bonificio as a dignitary person wearing a coat and tie than wearing a
white camisa de chino with red neckerchief and red drawstring pants and
shouting “Charge!” holding a big knife or bolo knife?
